Tuesday, January 17, 2017

The BIR’s 2017 priority programs

For businesses, the start of the new year means setting new goals and targets. Likewise, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) also has its own new set of plans for 2017.

This year, the BIR is tasked to collect P1.829 trillion which is equivalent to 79% of the National Government’s total projected tax revenue of P2.313 trillion. Although the target amount is lower than the last year’s collection goal which was P2.025 trillion, P1.829 trillion is still undeniably an uphill challenge.

To meet the new target, the BIR has 27 Priority Programs this 2017. These programs are anchored on three principal objectives, namely: (1) attain collection targets; (2) improve taxpayer services; and,(3) protect revenue and recapture public trust. 

Actually, most of the programs are congruent with the continuing priorities of the BIR in its High Level Strategic Plan for 2016-2020. These include strengthening the Run After Tax Evaders (RATE) and Oplan Kandado programs; increasing awareness of the benefits brought by Exchange of Information (EOI) Program in collecting taxes on cross-border transactions; and enhancing the electronic registrations.

Of the BIR’s 27 Priority Programs, I picked out the particular items below which could be interesting. 

1. Broadening of the tax base without increasing tax rates.
The strategy is to cover unregistered taxpayers/businesses as a result of tax compliance verification drives (TCVD) and third-party information (e.g. from other government agencies).

No increase in tax rates is definitely a welcome news for taxpayers. Further, in the eyes of compliant taxpayers, the strategy of running after unregistered taxpayers is certainly better than a strategy of doing annual tax assessments on a registered taxpayer. It has always been the sentiment of many registered taxpayers that the apparent unceasing BIR audits against them are unfounded and have been a significant disruption of their business operations. 

On the other hand, I would also like to caution registered taxpayers to be prudent by avoiding transactions with fly-by night businesses. This involves having strict policies on supplier accreditation, including asking your suppliers for BIR-registered documents when transacting with them. 

2. Simplification of tax forms
This pertains to simplifying the tax forms, including filing frequency, according to taxpayer’s business size (large/medium/small/micro).

I believe that this has been long a battlecry of taxpayers. Our tax laws should not treat every business alike, particularly with respect to tax reporting requirements, as there are requirements that are applicable only to large or medium businesses, but not to small and micro businesses. 

Needless to say, tax forms and the frequency of filing come with basic tax compliance. If these are simplified, it would encourage better compliance by making it easier and less costly for taxpayers.

3. Review of revenue issuances and tax rulings.
Part of the BIR’s program is to review and recall, if warranted, revenue issuances which impose unnecessary burdens on taxpayers, and to review and revoke tax rulings which hinder business transactions.

This strategy deserves applause from taxpayer because a number of revenue issuances require re-evaluation. One concrete example is Revenue Regulations No. 12-2013 which provides that, even if a taxpayer pays for the deficiency withholding taxes at the time of the BIR investigation, the expenses, to which such withholding taxes relate, will still be disallowed by the BIR for income tax purposes. A lot of criticism has emerged on this issuance, with a consensus forming that the rule is unreasonable. Taxpayers are hoping that the BIR can expedite the review of this issuance.

4. Integrity Management Program.
The intent is to install a standard but flexible approach at the Agency and Program levels in ensuring that standard norms of conduct for public officials are consistently applied, through:

• Removal of corrupt and erring revenue personnel (Revenue Integrity Protection Service/Ombudsman/BIR Internal Affairs Service) and to relieve/transfer personnel with unsatisfactory records of collection performance; and

• Strengthening the Internal Affairs Service to swift action of administrative cases filed against BIR personnel.

The issue of corruption and erring revenue personnel has been a perennial concern of the taxpayers. This issue has also discouraged a lot of investors and potential investors from operating in the Philippines.

I believe that the above program is very basic, but it goes to the very heart of our tax assessment process. Without corruption and malfeasance, taxpayers will no longer have the perception of being at the mercy of BIR examiners who come up with haphazard and unfounded tax findings during the investigation process.

Other priority programs can be seen in Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 05-2017.

The BIR has always counted on its priority programs to help the agency attain its collection targets. I think that these priority programs can succeed if the BIR wins the full cooperation and trust of taxpayers. 

Richard R. Ibarra is a manager with the Tax Advisory and Compliance division of Punongbayan & Araullo. P&A is a leading audit, tax, advisory and outsourcing services firm and is the Philippine member of Grant Thornton International Ltd.


source:  Businessworld

Thursday, January 5, 2017

VAT Refunds: Who, what, where, when and how

Taxwise or Otherwise
By Jocelyn T. Tsang, 5 January 2017

“Show me the money!” -- Rod Tidwell, Jerry Maguire.

The catchphrase made famous by actor Cuba Gooding Jr. seems to perfectly capture the constant pressure received by consultants like me who assist taxpayers in the recovery of their excess or unused input taxes remitted to the Philippine tax authority.
To put things in context, let us revisit the basic principles surrounding the Philippine value-added tax (VAT) system. Briefly, except for certain specific transactions or taxpayers that are exempt, any person who sells, leases or exchanges goods or services in the Philippines is subject to VAT at the rate of either 0% or 12%. However, being an indirect tax, the amount of VAT due from the seller is shifted or passed on to the buyer of the goods and/or services sold. The buyer then becomes entitled to claim the VAT paid as input tax credit against his output tax liabilities. As such, a taxpayer shall only pay the difference between the VAT on his own sales (output tax) and the VAT from his purchases (input tax).

In most cases, the amount of output tax will be more than the input tax, resulting in a VAT remittance to the government. However, there are instances when the opposite is true, particularly if the buyer’s own sales transactions are subject to 0% VAT (such as in the case of export sales). In such cases where the input VAT credits of a taxpayer exceed his output VAT liabilities, the Philippine Tax Code allows the taxpayer to carry over such excess to the succeeding quarters, or apply for a refund or issuance of a tax credit certificate (TCC).

For this article, let’s discuss the “who, what, where, when and how” with regard to the refund of excess or unused input taxes attributable to a taxpayer’s sales which are subject to 0% VAT.

Who? Any VAT-registered taxpayer claiming a refund of excess or unutilized input tax credits.

What? An application for the refund or issuance of a TCC representing excess or unutilized input tax credits attributable to zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales. Export sales are considered zero-rated sales while sales to entities registered with the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (or other free trade zones) or entities registered with the Board of Investments whose sales are 100% exported are effectively zero-rated sales.

Where? Claims/Applications for refund or issuance of a TCC representing excess input taxes attributable to export sales may be filed either with the Revenue District Office (RDO)/Large Taxpayers District Office (LTDO) having jurisdiction over the taxpayer-applicant or with the Bureau of Internal Revenue’s (BIR) VAT Credit Audit Division (VCAD).

On the other hand, claims/applications representing excess input taxes attributable to export-oriented sales (i.e., effectively zero-rated sales) may only be filed with the RDO/LTDO having jurisdiction over the taxpayer-applicant.

When? Refund claims/applications must be filed within two years from the close of the taxable quarter when the sales were made.

Once the claim/application is filed by the taxpayer, the BIR office where the claim was filed is required to act on the refund claim within a mandated 120-day period. Based on a 2014 Supreme Court decision, inaction by the BIR within this period shall be deemed a denial of the claim. For taxpayers who generate their revenues from export sales, experience would show that it is more advisable to file the claim with the VCAD. This is because, unlike the RDO/LTDO which has numerous functions, the sole function of the VCAD is to cater to refund claims filed by direct exporters.

How? Aside from being able to substantiate the claim with compliant supporting documents, it is also important for applicants to know how to calculate the amount to be applied for refund.

For taxpayers whose sales are all considered export or export-oriented, the refundable amount shall be the covered period’s current purchases.

For taxpayers with mixed transactions (i.e., with sales subject to 12% VAT and with sales subject to 0% VAT), only the input taxes attributable to the export or export-oriented sales (zero-rated sales) shall be eligible for refund. Where specific identification is not possible, the input tax is allocated based on sales volume.

After allocating the input tax, please do note that in cases where the current period’s input taxes attributable to domestic sales is greater than current period’s output VAT liabilities, such excess input taxes would be included in the VAT credit balances to be carried forward. As mentioned, only the current period’s input taxes attributable to zero-rated sales would be eligible for refund. On the other hand, in case the current period’s input taxes attributable to domestic sales is less than current period’s output VAT liabilities, the output tax still due for the current period of the claim shall be deducted from the current period’s input taxes attributable to zero-rated sales. Only the balance of current period’s input tax attributable to zero-rated sales, after deducting the “output tax still due,” will be eligible for refund.

Undoubtedly, processing a tax refund is considered a tedious process; nonetheless, succeeding in this endeavor (without Court intervention) is not an impossible feat. In fact, this author believes that by at least knowing the above basics of VAT refunds, taxpayers do have a fighting chance during the 120-day ordeal with the BIR. Knowing the basics also applies to taxpayers who prefer to seek external assistance from consultants as this will make the refund application process go smoothly and increase the chances of full recovery. In turn, this will help relieve the pressure to “show me the money” as it gives life to the other oft-quoted catchphrase -- “help me, help you.”

The views or opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Isla Lipana & Co. The firm will not accept any liability arising from the article.

Jocelyn T. Tsang is a Senior Manager belonging to the Tax Services Department of Isla Lipana & Co., the Philippine member firm of the PwC network. 

VAT Refunds: Who, what, where, when and how

“Show me the money!” -- Rod Tidwell, Jerry Maguire.
The catchphrase made famous by actor Cuba Gooding Jr. seems to perfectly capture the constant pressure received by consultants like me who assist taxpayers in the recovery of their excess or unused input taxes remitted to the Philippine tax authority.
To put things in context, let us revisit the basic principles surrounding the Philippine value-added tax (VAT) system. Briefly, except for certain specific transactions or taxpayers that are exempt, any person who sells, leases or exchanges goods or services in the Philippines is subject to VAT at the rate of either 0% or 12%. However, being an indirect tax, the amount of VAT due from the seller is shifted or passed on to the buyer of the goods and/or services sold. The buyer then becomes entitled to claim the VAT paid as input tax credit against his output tax liabilities. As such, a taxpayer shall only pay the difference between the VAT on his own sales (output tax) and the VAT from his purchases (input tax). 

In most cases, the amount of output tax will be more than the input tax, resulting in a VAT remittance to the government. However, there are instances when the opposite is true, particularly if the buyer’s own sales transactions are subject to 0% VAT (such as in the case of export sales). In such cases where the input VAT credits of a taxpayer exceed his output VAT liabilities, the Philippine Tax Code allows the taxpayer to carry over such excess to the succeeding quarters, or apply for a refund or issuance of a tax credit certificate (TCC). 

For this article, let’s discuss the “who, what, where, when and how” with regard to the refund of excess or unused input taxes attributable to a taxpayer’s sales which are subject to 0% VAT.

Who? Any VAT-registered taxpayer claiming a refund of excess or unutilized input tax credits. 

What? An application for the refund or issuance of a TCC representing excess or unutilized input tax credits attributable to zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales. Export sales are considered zero-rated sales while sales to entities registered with the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (or other free trade zones) or entities registered with the Board of Investments whose sales are 100% exported are effectively zero-rated sales. 

Where? Claims/Applications for refund or issuance of a TCC representing excess input taxes attributable to export sales may be filed either with the Revenue District Office (RDO)/Large Taxpayers District Office (LTDO) having jurisdiction over the taxpayer-applicant or with the Bureau of Internal Revenue’s (BIR) VAT Credit Audit Division (VCAD). 

On the other hand, claims/applications representing excess input taxes attributable to export-oriented sales (i.e., effectively zero-rated sales) may only be filed with the RDO/LTDO having jurisdiction over the taxpayer-applicant.

When? Refund claims/applications must be filed within two years from the close of the taxable quarter when the sales were made.

Once the claim/application is filed by the taxpayer, the BIR office where the claim was filed is required to act on the refund claim within a mandated 120-day period. Based on a 2014 Supreme Court decision, inaction by the BIR within this period shall be deemed a denial of the claim. For taxpayers who generate their revenues from export sales, experience would show that it is more advisable to file the claim with the VCAD. This is because, unlike the RDO/LTDO which has numerous functions, the sole function of the VCAD is to cater to refund claims filed by direct exporters.

How? Aside from being able to substantiate the claim with compliant supporting documents, it is also important for applicants to know how to calculate the amount to be applied for refund. 

For taxpayers whose sales are all considered export or export-oriented, the refundable amount shall be the covered period’s current purchases.

For taxpayers with mixed transactions (i.e., with sales subject to 12% VAT and with sales subject to 0% VAT), only the input taxes attributable to the export or export-oriented sales (zero-rated sales) shall be eligible for refund. Where specific identification is not possible, the input tax is allocated based on sales volume. 

After allocating the input tax, please do note that in cases where the current period’s input taxes attributable to domestic sales is greater than current period’s output VAT liabilities, such excess input taxes would be included in the VAT credit balances to be carried forward. As mentioned, only the current period’s input taxes attributable to zero-rated sales would be eligible for refund. On the other hand, in case the current period’s input taxes attributable to domestic sales is less than current period’s output VAT liabilities, the output tax still due for the current period of the claim shall be deducted from the current period’s input taxes attributable to zero-rated sales. Only the balance of current period’s input tax attributable to zero-rated sales, after deducting the “output tax still due,” will be eligible for refund.

Undoubtedly, processing a tax refund is considered a tedious process; nonetheless, succeeding in this endeavor (without Court intervention) is not an impossible feat. In fact, this author believes that by at least knowing the above basics of VAT refunds, taxpayers do have a fighting chance during the 120-day ordeal with the BIR. Knowing the basics also applies to taxpayers who prefer to seek external assistance from consultants as this will make the refund application process go smoothly and increase the chances of full recovery. In turn, this will help relieve the pressure to “show me the money” as it gives life to the other oft-quoted catchphrase -- “help me, help you.”

The views or opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Isla Lipana & Co. The firm will not accept any liability arising from the article
Jocelyn T. Tsang is a Senior Manager belonging to the Tax Services Department of Isla Lipana & Co., the Philippine member firm of the PwC network.